Magyar
Toggle navigation
Tudóstér
Magyar
Tudóstér
Keresés
Egyszerű keresés
Összetett keresés
CCL keresés
Egyszerű keresés
Összetett keresés
CCL keresés
Böngészés
Saját polc tartalma
(
0
)
Korábbi keresések
Összesen 1 találat.
#/oldal:
12
36
60
120
Rövid
Hosszú
MARC
Részletezés:
Rendezés:
Szerző növekvő
Szerző csökkenő
Cím növekvő
Cím csökkenő
Dátum növekvő
Dátum csökkenő
1.
001-es BibID:
BIBFORM078765
Első szerző:
Bujdosóné Dani Erzsébet (informatikus-könyvtáros)
Cím:
How "Publish or Perish" Can Become "Publish and Perish" in the Age of Objective Assessment of Scientific Quality / ErzsébetDani
Dátum:
2018
ISSN:
1690-4524
Megjegyzések:
The point I wish to make is not what we all know: that the methods to assess the quality of research achievement are controversial. I do not wish to call into question the raison d'être of scientometric approach, its methodology or its particular indicators either. Nor am I aiming at coming up with systematic solutions of the contradictions (although I hope to offer some thoughts in that direction later below). Many have called and keep calling attention to the rigid and uniform application of the numerical approach (counting publications), arguing that it is doing injustice to certain areas of science. With that as a starting point, this study is intended to serve two purposes. One, in a much sharper tone than generally used in discussions of the topic, I wish to call attention to how extremely harmful the present scientometric practice may be for many scholars and scientists. Two, also partly in support of the former argument, I propose to demonstrate-to the degree of breadth and depth that the size-constraints of this paper make possible-how the crucial contradiction in question at the core of the present practice follows from the myths generated by scientometry itself. Here is the paradox: it is the mechanical application and overvaluation of the scientometric assessment of research performance, the very objectivity designed to guarantee equal and fair treatment that does, in fact, lead to the devaluation of quality research effort and discourages even kills the will to conduct research in several disciplines. That is to say, the partly true, part-fun proverbial ?publish or perish" principle, which urges the research scientist or academic to keep publishing for the sake of career advancement and academic survival, turns into the trap of what we can describe as ?publish and perish." How a well-intentioned and basically most welcome development, scientometry, or rather, its method of application as well as the myths it generated yield the ?publish and perish" phenomenon is the subject I will address below.
Tárgyszavak:
Műszaki tudományok
Informatikai tudományok
idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban
bibliometrics
scientometrics
scientific publications
scientific assessment
Hirsch-index
Megjelenés:
Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. - 16 : 4 (2018), p. 20-25. -
Internet cím:
Szerző által megadott URL
Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon:
Rekordok letöltése
1
Corvina könyvtári katalógus v8.2.27
© 2023
Monguz kft.
Minden jog fenntartva.