Találati lista | Tudóstér

001-es BibID:	BIBFORM098590
035-os BibID:	(cikkazonosító)50
Első szerző:	Armond, Anna Catharina Vieira (PhD hallgató)
Cím:	A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases / Armond Anna Catharina Vieira, Gordijn Bert, Lewis Jonathan, Hosseini Mohammad, Bodnár János Kristóf, Holm Soren, Kakuk Péter
Dátum:	2021
ISSN:	1472-6939
Megjegyzések:	Background The areas of Research Ethics (RE) and Research Integrity (RI) are rapidly evolving. Cases of research misconduct, other transgressions related to RE and RI, and forms of ethically questionable behaviors have been frequently published. The objective of this scoping review was to collect RE and RI cases, analyze their main characteristics, and discuss how these cases are represented in the scientific literature. Methods The search included cases involving a violation of, or misbehavior, poor judgment, or detrimental research practice in relation to a normative framework. A search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, JSTOR, Ovid, and Science Direct in March 2018, without language or date restriction. Data relating to the articles and the cases were extracted from case descriptions. Results A total of 14,719 records were identified, and 388 items were included in the qualitative synthesis. The papers contained 500 case descriptions. After applying the eligibility criteria, 238 cases were included in the analysis. In the case analysis, fabrication and falsification were the most frequently tagged violations (44.9%). The non-adherence to pertinent laws and regulations, such as lack of informed consent and REC approval, was the second most frequently tagged violation (15.7%), followed by patient safety issues (11.1%) and plagiarism (6.9%). 80.8% of cases were from the Medical and Health Sciences, 11.5% from the Natural Sciences, 4.3% from Social Sciences, 2.1% from Engineering and Technology, and 1.3% from Humanities. Paper retraction was the most prevalent sanction (45.4%), followed by exclusion from funding applications (35.5%). Conclusions Case descriptions found in academic journals are dominated by discussions regarding prominent cases and are mainly published in the news section of journals. Our results show that there is an overrepresentation of biomedical research cases over other scientific fields compared to its proportion in scientific publications. The cases mostly involve fabrication, falsification, and patient safety issues. This finding could have a significant impact on the academic representation of misbehaviors. The predominance of fabrication and falsification cases might diverge the attention of the academic community from relevant but less visible violations, and from recently emerging forms of misbehaviors.
Tárgyszavak:	Orvostudományok Egészségtudományok idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban folyóiratcikk Research ethics Research integrity Scientifc misconduct Cases Review
Megjelenés:	BMC Medical Ethics. - 22 : 1 (2021), p. 1-14. -
További szerzők:	Gordijn, Bert Lewis, Jonathan Hosseini, Mohammad Bodnár János Kristóf (1984-) (filozófus) Holm, Soren Kakuk Péter (1973-) (filozófus)
Internet cím:	Szerző által megadott URL DOI Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon: