CCL

Összesen 4 találat.
#/oldal:
Részletezés:
Rendezés:

1.

001-es BibID:BIBFORM043921
Első szerző:Hassan, Ziad (szemész)
Cím:Assessment of tear osmolarity and other dry eye parameters in post-LASIK eyes / Ziad Hassan, Eszter Szalai, András Berta, László Módis Jr., Gábor Németh
Dátum:2013
ISSN:0277-3740
Tárgyszavak:Orvostudományok Klinikai orvostudományok idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban
Megjelenés:Cornea. - 32 : 7 (2013), p. e142-145. -
További szerzők:Szalai Eszter (1984-) (orvos) Berta András (1955-) (szemész, gyermekszemész) Módis László (1964-) (szemész szakorvos, kontaktológus) Németh Gábor (1975-) (szemész)
Internet cím:Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:

2.

001-es BibID:BIBFORM027972
Első szerző:Módis László (szemész szakorvos, kontaktológus)
Cím:Keratometry evaluations with the pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography / László Módis, Eszter Szalai, Bence Kolozsvári, Gábor Németh, Attila Vajas, András Berta
Dátum:2012
ISSN:0277-3740
Megjegyzések:To determine the reliability and repeatability of keratometry (K) measurements obtained with the Pentacam high resolution (HR), automated keratometry, and corneal topography systems. METHODS: : The right eyes of 46 healthy subjects were examined prospectively. Keratometry measurements in the flat (Kf) and steep (Ks) meridians were taken by 2 independent investigators with the Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) followed by automated keratorefractometry (KR-8100; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), and corneal topography (TMS-4; Tomey, Erlangen, Germany). RESULTS: : The mean K readings of the Pentacam HR, automated keratometry, and corneal topography were 43.40/43.34 diopter (D), 43.99/43.98 D, and 43.80/43.83 D, respectively. The difference between the values was statistically significant (P < 0.0001, repeated measures analysis of variance). Strong significant correlation was observed between the Pentacam HR and keratometry (Kf: r = 0.952/0.954; Ks: r = 0.845, Spearman rank test), and Pentacam HR and corneal topography (Kf: r = 0.933/0.930; Ks: r = 0.838/0.829) (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was presented between the 2 investigators for any of the instruments (P = 0.215-0.983). Moreover, high correlation was found between the K readings of the observers (interoperator intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.95 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: : The Pentacam HR provided reliable K measurements in clinical practice in comparison with an automated keratometer and a corneal topographer. Based on the results, for patient follow-up, one keratometry device is recommended.
Tárgyszavak:Orvostudományok Klinikai orvostudományok idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban
Megjelenés:Cornea 31 : 1 (2012), p. 36-41. -
További szerzők:Szalai Eszter (1984-) (orvos) Kolozsvári Bence Lajos (1977-) (szemész) Németh Gábor (1975-) (szemész) Vajas Attila (1973-) (szemész) Berta András (1955-) (szemész, gyermekszemész)
Internet cím:Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
DOI
Borító:

3.

001-es BibID:BIBFORM013627
Első szerző:Módis László (szemész szakorvos, kontaktológus)
Cím:Reliability of the Corneal Thickness Measurements with the Pentacam HR Imaging System and Ultrasound Pachymetry / Módis L. Jr., Szalai E., Németh G., Berta A.
Dátum:2011
ISSN:0277-3740
Megjegyzések:PURPOSE: To obtain the central corneal thickness (CCT) of healthy eyes using the rotating Scheimpflug imaging system and compare these results with conventional ultrasound pachymetry values. Interoperator reliability and repeatability of the different techniques were also determined. METHODS: CCT was measured on the right eye of 46 healthy subjects with the Pentacam HR (Pentacam High Resolution; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) and contact ultrasound pachymetry (AL-2000; Tomey, Tennenlohe, Germany) by 2 independent investigators. RESULTS: Both observers obtained significantly higher CCT readings with the Pentacam HR imaging system (572 ± 33 and 575 ± 31 m) than with the ultrasound device (546 ± 27 and 548 ± 28 m) (P < 0.0001, paired Student t test). Strong and significant correlation was found between the 2 pachymetry techniques regardless of the investigator (r = 0.845 and 0.831, Spearman correlation coefficient) (P < 0.0001). For the Pentacam HR values, statistically significant difference was detected between the observers (P = 0.033). For both pachymetry methods, the degree of agreement between the investigators was reflected by the high interoperator intraclass correlation coefficient value (ICC = 0.96). No significant difference was disclosed between the 3 consecutive readings of either instrument (P > 0.05, analysis of variance). CONCLUSIONS: Significant difference in CCT values between the high-resolution Pentacam imaging system and the ultrasound pachymeter suggests that the 2 techniques cannot be used interchangeably in clinical practice.
Tárgyszavak:Orvostudományok Klinikai orvostudományok idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban
Megjelenés:Cornea. - 30 : 5 (2011), p. 561-566. -
További szerzők:Szalai Eszter (1984-) (orvos) Németh Gábor (1975-) (szemész) Berta András (1955-) (szemész, gyermekszemész)
Internet cím:Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
DOI
Borító:

4.

001-es BibID:BIBFORM018468
Első szerző:Szalai Eszter (orvos)
Cím:Evaluation of the Corneal Endothelium Using Noncontact and Contact Specular Microscopy / Szalai Eszter, Németh Gábor, Berta András, Jr. Módis László
Dátum:2011
ISSN:0277-3740
Megjegyzések:To determine the difference between the endothelial cell density (ECD) and the morphologic measurements assessed with a recently developed noncontact specular microscope compared with a contact endothelial microscope. The agreement between the 2 independent operators was also investigated. Methods: The central corneal endothelium was examined in the right eyes of 41 healthy individuals using automated image analysis programs without correction for a noncontact specular microscope and a contact specular microscope (EM-3000, EM-1000; Tomey, Tennenlohe, Germany). The evaluated parameters such as ECD, average cell area (AVG), and coefficient of variation of the cell area were determined by 2 operators. Conversion factors were also considered to adjust the ECD values. Results: ECD measurements obtained with the noncontact instrument (2734 +/- 287 cells per square millimeter, first operator; 2726 +/- 282 cells per square millimeter, second operator) were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in comparison with the contact microscope (2283 +/- 206 cells per square millimeter, first operator; 2274 +/- 242 cells per square millimeter, second operator) by both investigators. The contact specular microscope significantly over-estimated (P < 0.0001) AVG and coefficient of variation of the cell area values. Statistically significant correlation (P < 0.0001) was detected in ECD (r = 0.77, first operator) and AVG measurements (r = 0.72, first operator) between the 2 endothelial microscopes. Higher degree of agreement between operators was given when using the noncontact specular microscope compared with the contact instrument. Conclusions: The significant differences and the poor agreement between the automated software options disclosed that the 2 instruments cannot be used interchangeably.
Tárgyszavak:Orvostudományok Klinikai orvostudományok idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban
Megjelenés:Cornea. - 30 : 5 (2011), p. 567-570. -
További szerzők:Németh Gábor (1975-) (szemész) Berta András (1955-) (szemész, gyermekszemész) Módis László (1964-) (szemész szakorvos, kontaktológus)
Internet cím:DOI
Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Rekordok letöltése1