Találati lista | Tudóstér

001-es BibID:	BIBFORM116212
035-os BibID:	(WOS)001037001400001 (Scopus)85163872728 (cikkazonosító)110176
Első szerző:	Burrascano, Sabina
Cím:	Where are we now with European forest multi-taxon biodiversity and where can we head to? / Sabina Burrascano, Francesco Chianucci, Giovanni Trentanovi, Elek Zoltan
Dátum:	2023
ISSN:	0006-3207
Megjegyzések:	The European biodiversity and forest strategies rely on forest sustainable management (SFM) to conserve forest biodiversity. However, current sustainability assessments hardly account for direct biodiversity indicators. We focused on forest multi-taxon biodiversity to: i) gather and map the existing information; ii) identify knowledge and research gaps; iii) discuss its research potential. We established a research network to fit data on species, standing trees, lying deadwood and sampling unit description from 34 local datasets across 3591 sampling units. A total of 8724 species were represented, with the share of common and rare species varying across taxonomic classes: some included many species with several rare ones (e.g., Insecta); others (e.g., Bryopsida) were repre-sented by few common species. Tree-related structural attributes were sampled in a subset of sampling units (2889; 2356; 2309 and 1388 respectively for diameter, height, deadwood and microhabitats). Overall, multi-taxon studies are biased towards mature forests and may underrepresent the species related to other develop-mental phases. European forest compositional categories were all represented, but beech forests were over-represented as compared to thermophilous and boreal forests. Most sampling units (94%) were referred to a habitat type of conservation concern. Existing information may support European conservation and SFM stra-tegies in: (i) methodological harmonization and coordinated monitoring; (ii) definition and testing of SFM in-dicators and thresholds; (iii) data-driven assessment of the effects of environmental and management drivers on multi-taxon forest biological and functional diversity, (iv) multi-scale forest monitoring integrating in-situ and remotely sensed information.
Tárgyszavak:	Természettudományok Biológiai tudományok idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban folyóiratcikk Biodiversity conservation Forest biodiversity Forest stand structure Multi-taxon Sustainable management
Megjelenés:	Biological Conservation. - 284 (2023), p. 1-13. -
További szerzők:	Chianucci, Francesco Trentanovi, Giovanni Elek Zoltán
Internet cím:	Szerző által megadott URL DOI Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon:

001-es BibID:	BIBFORM113450
035-os BibID:	(cikkazonosító)110075 (WoS)000983613900001 (Scopus)85152930316
Első szerző:	Lövei Gábor L.
Cím:	The need for a (non-destructive) method revolution in entomology / Gábor L. Lövei, Marco Ferrante, Daniella Möller, Gabriella Möller, Éva Vincze
Dátum:	2023
ISSN:	0006-3207
Megjegyzések:	There are worrying signs that arthropods are in decline both in density and diversity. This threatens global biodiversity as well as the ecosystem services provided by arthropods. Nonetheless, entomological research, even when studying arthropods with a conservation focus, frequently uses lethal methods. We analysed 1029 articles published in the major biological conservation journals between 2014 and 2020 and found that, while singlespecies-focused studies used more non-lethal than lethal methods (76.3 % vs. 23.7 %, respectively), the opposite was true for multiple species ones (24.0 % vs. 76.0 %). In tropical regions, 74.6 % of studies used lethal methods vs. 18.5 % non-lethal ones. Of the major orders, Odonata, Lepidoptera and Orthoptera were generally studied using non-lethal methods (88.1 %, 80.7 %, and 70.8 %, respectively) in non-tropical regions, while in the tropics, only Lepidoptera were frequently (51.9 %) studied by such methods. We argue that even if the evidence for arthropod decline were uncertain, and even if research would not add much to the overall level of mortality, entomologists should be showing an example. If research on invertebrates continues to be ethically blind, entomologists risk losing public support for conserving arthropod diversity.
Tárgyszavak:	Természettudományok Biológiai tudományok idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban folyóiratcikk Ethics Arthropod conservation Entomological methods Biodiversity protection
Megjelenés:	Biological Conservation. - 282 (2023), p. 1-5.(cikkazonosító)110075. -
További szerzők:	Ferrante, Marco Möller, Daniella Möller, Gabriella Vincze Éva (1990-) (környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök)
Internet cím:	Szerző által megadott URL DOI Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon: