Magyar
Toggle navigation
Tudóstér
Magyar
Tudóstér
Keresés
Egyszerű keresés
Összetett keresés
CCL keresés
Egyszerű keresés
Összetett keresés
CCL keresés
Böngészés
Saját polc tartalma
(
0
)
Korábbi keresések
CCL parancs
CCL
Összesen 5 találat.
#/oldal:
12
36
60
120
Rövid
Hosszú
MARC
Részletezés:
Rendezés:
Szerző növekvő
Szerző csökkenő
Cím növekvő
Cím csökkenő
Dátum növekvő
Dátum csökkenő
1.
001-es BibID:
BIBFORM104409
035-os BibID:
(WOS)000599897900006 (Scopus)85096388713
Első szerző:
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Cím:
Curriculum vitae : challenges and potential solutions / Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Judit Dobránszki, Aceil Al-Khatib, Panagiotis Tsigaris
Dátum:
2020
ISSN:
2063-7330
Megjegyzések:
An academic usually has a curriculum vitae (CV) or CV summary (resume) that highlights their professional career paths. CVs contain information which is written by the academic to signal their qualifications and academic achievements to employers, granting agencies, or promotion and tenure committees. Decision makers face numerous problems with CVs as a vehicle that carries important information, including incomplete, outdated, biased, private, as well as falsified and fabricated information. To complicate matters, decision makers themselves could be making biased decisions even when CV information is complete and accurate due to potential discriminatory practices. There is weak consistency or standardization in implementation internationally, and little verification. This paper proposes a set of guidelines for verifiable, accurate, complete, updated, and public (VACUP guidelines) CVs, whether these be private, institutional, or owned by third parties. For the effective implementation of these guidelines, a new market in which a third party certifies the CV as VACUP-compliant, is recommended.
Tárgyszavak:
Társadalomtudományok
Média- és kommunikációs tudományok
idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény hazai lapban
folyóiratcikk
accountability
CV
portfolio
professional summary
public record
signaling
transparency
Megjelenés:
KOME. - 8 : 2 (2020), p. 109-127. -
További szerzők:
Dobránszki Judit (1967-) (biológus)
Al-Khatib, Aceil
Tsigaris, Panagiotis
Internet cím:
Szerző által megadott URL
DOI
Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon:
2.
001-es BibID:
BIBFORM104402
035-os BibID:
(WOS)000473801500007 (Scopus)85068832045
Első szerző:
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Cím:
Establishing Rules for Ethicists and Ethics Organizations in Academic Publishing to Avoid Conflicts of Interest, Favoritism, Cronyism and Nepotism / Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Vedran Katavić, Judit Dobránszki, Aceil Al-Khatib, Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti
Dátum:
2019
ISSN:
2063-7330
Megjegyzések:
A proliferation of publication venues, scholarly journals, use of social media to disseminate knowledge and research results, scientific information, increased international scientific collaboration, a move towards open knowledge and data sharing, recent scandals such as journal editors' coercive citations, fake peer review, peer review rings, data fabrication, research spin, and retraction of articles, several of the latter within the emergence of a post publication peer review movement, are some of the many reasons why publishing ethics are constantly evolving. These challenges have led to the birth of an increasing number of guidelines and recommendations being issued by multiple organizations and committees around the world in light of the recognized need to salvage peer review, and in an attempt to restore eroding trust in science, scientists and their publications. The principal objective of these guidelines and recommendations is supposedly to provide guidance for editors, reviewers and authors to conduct honest and ethical research and publishing practices, including responsible authorship and editorship, conflict of interest management, maintaining the confidentiality of peer review, and other ethical issues that arise in conducting and reporting research. Despite the fact that scholarly publishing is an international enterprise with global impact, current guidelines and recommendations appear to fall very short on imposing any obligations on their parent members, i.e., committee members who issue guidelines and recommend solutions for ethical dilemmas especially when such organizations are dependent on commercial publishers who may be paying members. Obviously, financial incentives indicate that ethical organizations or ethicists are not in a power position compared to editors or publishers. Imbalanced guidelines risk that hidden conflicts of interest, cronyism, or nepotism may corrupt the decision-making process or the ethical hierarchy that has been put into place to safe-guard research and publishing ethics. Therefore, the ethics gate-keepers to the integrity of scholarly publishing should also be carefully scrutinized, and strict ethical guidelines have to be imposed on them as equally as their rules are imposed on global academia to avoid the risk of further corrupting the scientific process as a result of the absence of strong exterior regulation or oversight. This theoretical paper highlights signs of favoritism and cronyism in ethics. It also offers proposals for rules (limitations and consequences) to avoid them in science publishing. Our guidelines should be used by academics in the position of authors or editors who may sense, perceive or detect abuses of power among ethicists.
Tárgyszavak:
Társadalomtudományok
Média- és kommunikációs tudományok
idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény hazai lapban
folyóiratcikk
organization ethics
ethical dilemmas
corruption
conflict of interest
Megjelenés:
KOME. - 7 : 1 (2019), p. 110-125. -
További szerzők:
Katavić, Vedran
Dobránszki Judit (1967-) (biológus)
Al-Khatib, Aceil
Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar
Internet cím:
Szerző által megadott URL
DOI
Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon:
3.
001-es BibID:
BIBFORM104399
035-os BibID:
(cikkazonosító)102071 (WOS)000496900700005 (Scopus)85073143173
Első szerző:
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Cím:
Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing : An assessment / Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Judit Dobránszki, Panagiotis Tsigaris, Aceil Al-Khatib
Dátum:
2019
ISSN:
0099-1333 1879-1999
Megjegyzések:
The issue of "predatory" publishing continues to affect many scholars around the world who publish. When one reads the fairly vast literature surrounding "predatory" publishing, there is an erroneous tendency to continue pivoting around Jeffrey Bean's blacklists of "predatory" open access (OA) journals and publishers. However, to be "predatory" involves much more than defining a handful of select behaviours, and it is becoming increasingly important to start defining, or curtailing, the lexicon to avoid referring to any journal or publisher that might display one of the following qualities (exploitative, deceptive, excessive, unscrupulous, abusive, advantageous, manipulative, profit-seeking, or others) as synonymously meaning "predatory". This paper focuses mainly on the oft-interchangeable terms "predatory" and "exploitation", and explores the morality of predatory and exploitative actions by applying a deontological ethics approach which implies that certain actions are wrong even if they achieve good consequences, with the understanding that because a predatory entity aims to exploit others, these actions would be considered morally wrong from a deontologist's perspective. In articulating our argument, we attempt to expand the conversation around this important topic, with the hope that it might bring additional clarity to the issue of what might constitute a "predatory" journal or publisher.
Tárgyszavak:
Társadalomtudományok
Média- és kommunikációs tudományok
idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban
folyóiratcikk
Beall
Blacklists
Deontological ethics
Exploitation
Predatory behaviour
Whitelists
Megjelenés:
Journal of Academic Librarianship. - 45 : 6 (2019), p. 1-8. -
További szerzők:
Dobránszki Judit (1967-) (biológus)
Tsigaris, Panagiotis
Al-Khatib, Aceil
Internet cím:
Szerző által megadott URL
DOI
Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon:
4.
001-es BibID:
BIBFORM099301
Első szerző:
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Cím:
Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior / Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Aceil Al-Khatib, Judit Dobra?nszki
Dátum:
2016
ISSN:
1353-3452
Tárgyszavak:
Agrártudományok
Élelmiszertudományok
idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban
Megjelenés:
Science And Engineering Ethics. - 23 : 4 (2016), p. 1213-1226. -
További szerzők:
Al-Khatib, Aceil
Dobránszki Judit (1967-) (biológus)
Internet cím:
Szerző által megadott URL
DOI
Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon:
5.
001-es BibID:
BIBFORM088938
Első szerző:
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Cím:
Legends in Science : from Boom to Bust / Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Judit Dobránszki, Aceil Al-Khatib
Dátum:
2016
ISSN:
1053-8801
Tárgyszavak:
Agrártudományok
Élelmiszertudományok
idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban
folyóiratcikk
Megjelenés:
Publishing Research Quarterly. - 32 : 4 (2016), p. 313-318. -
További szerzők:
Dobránszki Judit (1967-) (biológus)
Al-Khatib, Aceil
Internet cím:
DOI
Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon:
Rekordok letöltése
1
Corvina könyvtári katalógus v8.2.27
© 2023
Monguz kft.
Minden jog fenntartva.